Enes Kanter Freedom said on Wednesday during a show on the Fox News television network that he is considering suing the Chicago Sky over the ejection and arena ban that followed his courtside confrontation with Natasha Cloud, and he sent a letter to WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert the same day demanding a review of how he was removed.

“We might be looking into a lawsuit for sure because this is unacceptable,” Kanter Freedom said. “I didn’t break any of the rules, I didn’t say anything to players.”

In the letter, Kanter Freedom wrote that he attended the Aug. 23 game between the Sky and Indiana Fever as a paying courtside spectator, that he stayed behind the baseline, and that he received no warning before security escorted him out of Wintrust Arena.

Enes Kanter Freedom says he will SUE the Chicago Sky for kicking him out of the arena:

“We might be looking into a lawsuit for sure because this is unacceptable.

I didn’t break any of the rules, I didn’t say anything to players.” pic.twitter.com/KC2uOERDj3

— BrickCenter (@BrickCenter_) August 27, 2026

Editor's Picks

The one name Candace Parker carries into the Hall of Fame with her

Royce White and Enes Kanter Freedom are testing one line in the WNBA’s contract

Caitlin Clark gives honest update after ankle scare in Fever’s win over Dallas

Stephen A. Smith claims people are being harmed by Caitlin Clark discourse

 

He asked the league for an explanation, for a full refund on his tickets, and accused it of selective enforcement amounting to viewpoint discrimination. He has also argued that Cloud should have been ejected or fined instead.

“The circumstances of my removal only further highlight a pattern and practice of the League applying its rules unfairly. For example, why did arena personnel believe my ejection was warranted while Ms. Cloud appears to have escaped any accountability for clearly violating League rules against the use of profanity and insults directed at fans?”

“I should not be treated differently because the League, its players, or personnel disagree with my viewpoint. The timing and circumstances of my removal beg a variety of questions: Did my WNBA Draft announcement, prior communications with the League, public advocacy for women’s sports, or the message displayed on my shirt play a role in the decision to eject me?”

“On July 28, spectators outside the Seattle Storm v. Indiana Fever game were treated differently based on their viewpoints. While supporters of women’s sports were told they could not rally on the raised platform outside the arena, transgender activists were allowed to do so.”

“Next, on August 16, spectators at an Atlanta Dream v. Indiana Fever game were instructed to cover shirts supporting women’s sports that were like mine, while allowing pro-transgender shirts to remain. Although the WNBA subsequently acknowledged that the intervention ‘should not have happened,’ it was no more than a week later that I was removed from the August 23 WNBA game wearing a shirt expressing a similar viewpoint.”

“It goes without saying that when I purchase a ticket to attend a WNBA game, I expect that I will not be discriminated against based on my viewpoint.”

His Requests:

“Identify the policy, rule, directive, or instruction relied upon in treating certain spectators, including me, differently when we express a viewpoint that appears unpopular with the WNBA;

“Identify whether the decision to eject me was made or requested by WNBA personnel, Chicago Sky personnel, Wintrust Arena personnel, security personnel, or another individual or entity;

“Confirm whether Ms. Cloud’s conduct has been or will be reviewed under any League policy governing player interactions with fans, including rules governing altercations that require player suspension, and state what accountability, if any, she, her team, and management will face;

“Provide a full refund of the cost of my courtside tickets; and

“Preserve all materials relating to this incident, including relevant video footage, incident or security reports, communications concerning my attendance or removal, communications referring to my WNBA Draft announcement or public advocacy for women’s sports, and any applicable policies or event-day directives.”

Where the ‘no warning’ argument runs into the fan code

The WNBA fan code does not entitle spectators to a warning before ejection, OutKick reported. Sky principal owner Michael Alter, in an interview with the same outlet on Wednesday, said the moment Kanter Freedom stepped toward the court was the moment he became a potential threat, and that league security, arena security, both teams’ security staffs and the Chicago Police Department all moved at once. Asked why no warning was given, Alter compared it to firing a gun at someone.

Alter has also disputed the account of who started it. He told Chicago reporters this week that two people seated in the area confirmed the exchange began with Kanter Freedom trash-talking Cloud, which he characterized as basketball-related and aimed at provoking her. Cloud did not speak to the media after the game and met with league and team security, and her head coach defended her publicly.

Chicago Sky principal owner Michael Alter compares Enes Kanter Freedom’s ejection to the extreme example of someone shooting a gun when pressed on why the former NBA player wasn’t warned before being thrown out and later banned from Wintrust Arena.

“When you shoot a gun at… pic.twitter.com/QGtFZGcg3M

— Fox News (@FoxNews) August 27, 2026

 

Kanter Freedom declared for the 2027 WNBA Draft on Aug. 10, saying he identifies as a woman, in a challenge to the league’s eligibility language. Royce White followed. League sources told Front Office Sports that neither is eligible and called the declarations publicity stunts, and the Sky announced the arena ban on Tuesday.

The ineligibility ruling produced the courtside appearance, the courtside appearance produced the ejection, the ejection produced the ban, and the ban has now produced a letter to the commissioner and the threat of litigation. Every step taken to close this off has handed him another platform to work from.

No suit has been filed, and the Sky have said the ban stands until Kanter Freedom satisfies them that he can follow the building’s rules.